•  Do you have experience with Medical Malpractice statements?
• In my case, is there a statute of limitations or a period during which I need to file an application in order to be eligible for compensation?
• What factors do you think can work in my favor and which ones can against me?
• If I work with your company, who will be my regular contact person, who is on the Medical Malpractice team, and when can I expect a response from you?
• Do you think this may be a settlement or will we have to go to court?
• What do you think, what medical experts will confirm my case?
• Do you work for contingencies?
• Does your company pay all preliminary costs of the case, and are the costs of the case a problem for your company?
• How to bring the doctor to account for negligence?

Asking these questions, you should begin to understand the philosophy of law firms and what you think they can effectively manage your case. Seek experience in cases like yours, as well as empathy for your situation. Working with people you trust can mean the difference between worrying about whether you are properly represented in court or believing that your lawyer will be on your side and uphold your rights according to established laws in the state.

Picture Credit: rawpixel- https://unsplash.com/photos/5W4KDF0MDhM

The post Common Questions to Ask a Medical Malpractice Lawyer appeared first on Runnels Law.

“Serious” debt is the amount of $ 50 thousand. At such a debt, the IRS will already have to provide the service with relevant information. According to the law, “unpaid, legally binding federal tax obligation” debt, the amount of which exceeds $ 50 thousand (plus accounting for a fine and interest), is considered a “serious offense”. The minimum amount of tax debt will change periodically – depending on inflation and the cost of living. Moreover, the total tax debt, rather than the annual period, is taken into account.

Tax debts do not fall into the category of “serious tax debt”, if they meet certain conditions:

• The payment was made in time, under an installment agreement, drawn up by the IRS.
• The payment was made on time, in accordance with the agreement with the Ministry of Justice or the Proposal for concluding a compromise agreement.
• When the innocent spouse is released from responsibility; division of tangible property.

When collecting due process, in order to collect the debt, it is necessary to file a request with Levy in a timely manner.

The State Department gives the non-payer 90 days during which he can take the following measures to avoid depriving the passport:

• Fully pay off tax debt.
• Find a compromise with the US Internal Revenue Service.
• Eliminate all errors in certification.
• When sending information to the State Department, the IRS must necessarily notify the defaulter in writing. The notification will be sent to the last specified address by regular mail.

The Tax Service informs the State Department when:

• The request was sent erroneously.
• The tax debt is partially repaid and is no longer critical.
• The tax debt is completely repaid.

If the taxpayer considers that the request of the IRS to the State Department is unreasonable, then in such a situation it is possible to apply to the US District Court or the Tax Court.

If a decision is made to cancel the passport, the State Department must notify the taxpayer. Prior to notification, the passport is considered valid.

In the event that a taxpayer needs to travel abroad, you need to contact the telephone number indicated on the notice CP 508C to find out the status of your passport. In other cases, you must call the State Department (National Passport Information Center number: 1-877-487-2778).

Picture Credit: geralt

The post Did You Know the IRS Can Now Take Your Passport? appeared first on Runnels Law.

But this did not help to soften the verdict. At a recent court hearing, he was ordered to pay a large compensation amounting to $ 36,631,687.10 to various agencies, including the Federal Forestry Administration. And although the adolescent’s lawyer tried to prove that such a verdict was “a cruel and unusual punishment,” the judge in charge of the case disagreed with him and ordered the department for juvenile delinquents to draw up a payment schedule. In addition to the fine, the teenager will also have to work 2000 hours on public works.

But in the verdict there is an item that can partially alleviate the fate of the culprit of the fire. The court can find “satisfied” the claims of various departments for compensation if the teenager within the next 10 years will make available payments for him and will not commit any unlawful actions.

Picture Credit: skeeze

The post Oregon Teenager Must Pay $36.6 Million After Starting Forest Fire appeared first on Runnels Law.

“A member of the management of one of the world’s largest financial institutions Mark Johnson deceived his client into millions of dollars and for this he will now go to jail. This verdict should be a warning to everyone who is involved in criminal financial schemes, “said Acting Attorney General John Cronan. His words are quoted in the official message of the prosecutor’s office of the Eastern District.

As explained by the Inspector General of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Jay Lerner, Johnson and his accomplices “manipulated the foreign exchange market, abused their official powers and trust” of their clients. Together with Johnson in the case is the former head of foreign exchange operations HSBC in Europe, the Middle East and Africa Stuart Scott.

Both were accused that, using the intention of Cairn Energy to convert $ 3.5 billion into pounds and distribute them among its shareholders, they decided to play in advance and allowed HSBC to illegally earn approximately $ 7.3 million. Manipulating the exchange rate by deliberately buying pounds sterling the same bank HSBC, Johnson and Scott sold the client the target currency at an inflated rate.

Image credit: PublicDomainPictures

The post Penalty for Currency Fraud appeared first on Runnels Law.

Lucky girl found out about the win on January 6. Not even having to claim the prize, the woman was seriously concerned about her own safety. Fearing to be robbed or worse, the winner requires anonymity through the court.

She already managed to sign a winning ticket, following the rules of the lottery, but then realized that she had “committed a monstrous mistake.” The plaintiff, who conditionally calls herself Jane Doe, consulted with lawyers and learned that she has the right to confidentiality, and the ticket could be signed by a trustee.

The catch is that making any amendments to an already signed ticket automatically makes it invalid.

Dow would not have arranged an oral arrangement with representatives of the lottery about the non-disclosure of her identity – she wants confidentiality to be secured by a court decision.

The lawsuit says that divulging the real name of Doe would be a gross violation of the inviolability of her private life.

The court materials mention examples of winners of lotteries, who were victims of robbers, scammers and even murderers.

The Supreme Court of Hillsborough will consider the complaint of the woman on 21 February.

Image credit: FotografieLink

The post Woman won $559M in the lottery wants to stay anonymous appeared first on Runnels Law.